Rina Steenkamp - Privacy and technology

My annotated General Data Protection Regulation

Chapter I General provisions

Article 4 Definitions

October 2013

Article 4

For the purposes of this Regulation:

[Data subject]

[Personal data]

[Pseudonymous data]

[Encrypted data]

[Processing]

[Profiling]

[Filing system]

[Controller]

[Processor]

[Recipient]

[Third party]

[The data subject's consent]

[Personal data breach]

[Genetic data]

[Biometric data]

[Data concerning health]

[Main establishment]

[Representative]

[Enterprise]

[Group of undertakings]

[Binding corporate rules]

[Child]

[Supervisory authority]

[Source: October 2013]

Recital 23

(23) The principles of data protection should apply to any information concerning an identified or identifiable natural person. To determine whether a person is identifiable, account should be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used either by the controller or by any other person to identify or single out the individual directly or indirectly. To ascertain whether means are reasonable likely to be used to identify the individual, account should be taken of all objective factors, such as the costs of and the amount of time required for identification, taking into consideration both available technology at the time of the processing and technological development. The principles of data protection should therefore not apply to anonymous data, which is information that does not relate to an identified or identifiable natural person. This Regulation does therefore not concern the processing of such anonymous data, including for statistical and research purposes.

Recital 24

(24) When using identifiers provided by devices, applications, tools and protocols, such as Internet Protocol addresses, cookie identifiers and Radio Frequency Identification tags, this Regulation should be applicable to processing involving such data, unless those identifiers do not relate to an identified or identifiable natural person.

Recital 25

(25) Consent should be given explicitly by any appropriate method enabling a freely given specific and informed indication of the data subject's wishes, either by a statement or by a clear affirmative action that is the result of choice by the data subject, ensuring that individuals are aware that they give their consent to the processing of personal data, . Clear affirmative action could include ticking a box when visiting an Internet website or any other statement or conduct which clearly indicates in this context the data subject's acceptance of the proposed processing of their personal data. Silence, mere use of a service or inactivity should therefore not constitute consent. Consent should cover all processing activities carried out for the same purpose or purposes. If the data subject's consent is to be given following an electronic request, the request must be clear, concise and not unnecessarily disruptive to the use of the service for which it is provided.

Recital 26

(26) Personal data relating to health should include in particular all data pertaining to the health status of a data subject; information about the registration of the individual for the provision of health services; information about payments or eligibility for healthcare with respect to the individual; a number, symbol or particular assigned to an individual to uniquely identify the individual for health purposes; any information about the individual collected in the course of the provision of health services to the individual; information derived from the testing or examination of a body part or bodily substance, including biological samples; identification of a person as provider of healthcare to the individual; or any information on e.g. a disease, disability, disease risk, medical history, clinical treatment, or the actual physiological or biomedical state of the data subject independent of its source, such as e.g. from a physician or other health professional, a hospital, a medical device, or an in vitro diagnostic test.

Recital 27

(27) The main establishment of a controller in the Union should be determined according to objective criteria and should imply the effective and real exercise of management activities determining the main decisions as to the purposes, conditions and means of processing through stable arrangements. This criterion should not depend whether the processing of personal data is actually carried out at that location; the presence and use of technical means and technologies for processing personal data or processing activities do not, in themselves, constitute such main establishment and are therefore no determining criteria for a main establishment. The main establishment of the processor should be the place of its central administration in the Union.

Recital 28

(28) A group of undertakings should cover a controlling undertaking and its controlled undertakings, whereby the controlling undertaking should be the undertaking which can exercise a dominant influence over the other undertakings by virtue, for example, of ownership, financial participation or the rules which govern it or the power to have personal data protection rules implemented.

[Source: October 2013 | Notes: Recitals | Context: Recitals]

January 2012

Explanatory memorandum

3.4. Detailed explanation of the proposal

Article 4 contains definitions of terms used in the Regulation. While some definitions are taken over from Directive 95/46/EC, others are modified, complemented with additional elements, or newly introduced ('personal data breach' based on Article 2(h) of the e-privacy Directive 2002/58/EC [29] as amended by Directive 2009/136/EC [30], 'genetic data', 'biometric data', 'data concerning health', 'main establishment', 'representative', 'enterprise', 'group of undertakings', 'binding corporate rules', and of a 'child' which is based on the United Nation's Convention on the Rights of the Child [31], and 'supervisory authority'). In the definition of consent, the criterion 'explicit' is added to avoid confusing parallelism with 'unambiguous' consent and in order to have one single and consistent definition of consent, ensuring the awareness of the data subject that, and to what, he or she gives consent.

[Notes:]

[Source: January 2012 | Context: Proposal from the European Commission]

Article 4

For the purposes of this Regulation:

[Data subject] [Deleted: October 2013]

[Personal data] [Amended: October 2013]

[Processing]

[Filing system]

[Controller] [Amended: October 2013]

[Processor]

[Recipient]

[The data subject's consent]

[Personal data breach] [Amended: October 2013]

[Genetic data] [Amended: October 2013]

[Biometric data] [Amended: October 2013]

[Data concerning health] [Amended: October 2013]

[Main establishment] [Amended: October 2013]

[Representative] [Amended: October 2013]

[Enterprise]

[Group of undertakings]

[Binding corporate rules]

[Child]

[Supervisory authority]

[Source: January 2012 | Context: Proposal from the European Commission]

Recital 23 [Amended: October 2013]

(23) The principles of protection should apply to any information concerning an identified or identifiable person. To determine whether a person is identifiable, account should be taken of all the means likely reasonably to be used either by the controller or by any other person to identify the individual. The principles of data protection should not apply to data rendered anonymous in such a way that the data subject is no longer identifiable.

Recital 24 [Amended: October 2013]

(24) When using online services, individuals may be associated with online identifiers provided by their devices, applications, tools and protocols, such as Internet Protocol addresses or cookie identifiers. This may leave traces which, combined with unique identifiers and other information received by the servers, may be used to create profiles of the individuals and identify them. It follows that identification numbers, location data, online identifiers or other specific factors as such need not necessarily be considered as personal data in all circumstances.

Recital 25 [Amended: October 2013]

(25) Consent should be given explicitly by any appropriate method enabling a freely given specific and informed indication of the data subject's wishes, either by a statement or by a clear affirmative action by the data subject, ensuring that individuals are aware that they give their consent to the processing of personal data, including by ticking a box when visiting an Internet website or by any other statement or conduct which clearly indicates in this context the data subject's acceptance of the proposed processing of their personal data. Silence or inactivity should therefore not constitute consent. Consent should cover all processing activities carried out for the same purpose or purposes. If the data subject's consent is to be given following an electronic request, the request must be clear, concise and not unnecessarily disruptive to the use of the service for which it is provided.

Recital 26

(26) Personal data relating to health should include in particular all data pertaining to the health status of a data subject; information about the registration of the individual for the provision of health services; information about payments or eligibility for healthcare with respect to the individual; a number, symbol or particular assigned to an individual to uniquely identify the individual for health purposes; any information about the individual collected in the course of the provision of health services to the individual; information derived from the testing or examination of a body part or bodily substance, including biological samples; identification of a person as provider of healthcare to the individual; or any information on e.g. a disease, disability, disease risk, medical history, clinical treatment, or the actual physiological or biomedical state of the data subject independent of its source, such as e.g. from a physician or other health professional, a hospital, a medical device, or an in vitro diagnostic test.

Recital 27

(27) The main establishment of a controller in the Union should be determined according to objective criteria and should imply the effective and real exercise of management activities determining the main decisions as to the purposes, conditions and means of processing through stable arrangements. This criterion should not depend whether the processing of personal data is actually carried out at that location; the presence and use of technical means and technologies for processing personal data or processing activities do not, in themselves, constitute such main establishment and are therefore no determining criteria for a main establishment. The main establishment of the processor should be the place of its central administration in the Union.

Recital 28

(28) A group of undertakings should cover a controlling undertaking and its controlled undertakings, whereby the controlling undertaking should be the undertaking which can exercise a dominant influence over the other undertakings by virtue, for example, of ownership, financial participation or the rules which govern it or the power to have personal data protection rules implemented.

[Source: January 2012 | Notes: Recitals | Context: Proposal from the European Commission, Recitals]

Directive 95/46/EC

Chapter I General provisions

Article 2 Definitions

For the purposes of this Directive:

[Personal data]
[Processing of personal data (processing)]
[Personal data filing system (filing system)]
[Controller]
[Processor]
[Third party]
[Recipient]
[The data subject's consent]

[Context: Article 2 Directive 95/46/EC]